We will now examine the results of our exploratory analysis and use a combination of techniques to classify different subsets of T and B cells in the MALT sample.

Exploratory Analysis Results


The 3D UMAP plot opens in a new data viewer session (Figure 2). Each point is a different cell and they are clustered based on how similar their expression profiles are across proteins and genes. Because a graph-based clustering task was performed upstream, a biomarker table is also displayed under the plot. This table lists the proteins and genes that are most highly expressed in each graph-based cluster. The graph-based clustering found 11 clusters, so there are 11 columns in the biomarker table.



A 2D scatter plot has been added to the right of the UMAP plot. The points in the 2D scatter plot are the same cells as in the UMAP, but they are positioned along the x- and y-axes according to their expression level for two protein markers: CD3_TotalSeqB and CD4_TotalSeqB, respectively (Figure 4).





As you move the slider up and down, the corresponding points on both plots will dynamically update. The cells with a high expression for the CD3 protein marker (a marker for T cells) are highlighted and the deselected points are dimmed (Figure 8).



The CD3 positive cells are still selected, but now you can see how they separate into CD4 and CD8 positive populations (Figure 10).


The simplest way to classifying cell types is to look for the expression of key marker genes or proteins. This approach is more effective with CITE-Seq data than with gene expression data alone as the protein expression data has a better dynamic range and is less sparse. Additionally, many cell types have expected cell surface marker profiles established using other technologies such as flow cytometry or CyTOF. Let's compare the resolution power of the CD4 and CD8A gene expression markers compared to their protein counterparts.


The second 2D scatter plot has the CD8A and CD4 mRNA markers on the x- and y-axis, respectively (Figure 12). The protein expression data has a better dynamic range than the gene expression data, making it easier to identify sub-populations.


More than 2000 cells show positive expression for the CD4 cell surface protein.

  

Let's perform the same test on the gene expression data.


This time, only 500 cells show positive expression for the CD4 marker gene. This means that the protein data is less sparse (i.e. there fewer zero counts), which further helps to reliably detect sub-populations.

T cells

Based on the exploratory analysis above, most of the CD3 positive cells are in the group of cells in the right side of the UMAP plot. This is likely to be a group of T cells. We will now examine this group in more detail to identify T cell sub-populations.



This group of putative T cells predominantly consists of cells assigned to graph-based clusters 3, 4, and 6, indicated by the colors. Examining the biomarker table for these clusters can help us infer different types of T cell.

If you need to create more space on the canvas, hide the panel words on the left using the arrow .


Cluster 6 has several interesting biomarkers. The top biomarker is CXCL13, a gene expressed by follicular B helper T cells (Tfh cells). Another biomarker is the PD-1 protein, which is expressed in Tfh cells. This protein promotes self-tolerance and is a target for immunotherapy drugs. The TIGIT protein is also expressed in cluster 6 and is another immunotherapy drug target that promotes self-tolerance.

Cluster 4 expresses several marker genes associated with cytotoxicity (e.g. NKG7 and GZMA) and both CD3 and CD8 proteins. Thus, these are likely to be cytotoxic cells. 

We can visually confirm these expression patterns and assess the specificity of these markers by coloring the cells on the UMAP plot based on their expression of these markers.

We will color the cells on the duplicate by their expression of marker genes, while keeping the original plot colored by graph-based cluster assignment. 


The cells with higher CXCL13 and NKG7 expression are now colored green and red, respectively. By looking at the two UMAP plots side by side, you can see these two marker genes are localized in graph-based clusters 6 and 4, respectively (Figure 19).




We can classify the remaining cells as helper T cells, as they predominantly express the CD4 protein marker.


Let's look at our progress so far, before we classify subsets of B-cells.


B cells

In addition to T-cells, we would expect to see B lymphocytes, at least some of which are malignant, in a MALT tumor sample. We can color the plot by expression of a B cell marker to locate these cells on the UMAP plot.

The cells in the UMAP plot are now colored from grey to blue according to their expression level for the CD19 protein marker (Figure 24). The CD19 positive cells correspond to several graph-based clusters. We can filter to these cells to examine them more closely,



The plots will rescale to include the selected points. The CD19 positive cells include cells from graph-based clusters 1, 2 and 7 (Figure 26).



While these cells express T cell markers, they also group closely with other putative B cells and express B cell markers (CD19). Therefore, these cells are likely to be doublets.






The biomarkers for clusters 1 and 2 also show an interesting pattern. Cluster 1 lists IGHD as its top biomarker, while cluster 2 lists IGHA1 as the fourth most significant. Both IGHD (Immunoglobulin Heavy Constant Delta) and IGHA1 (Immunoglobulin Heavy Constant Alpha 1) encode classes of the immunoglobulin heavy chain constant region. IGHD is part of IgD, which is expressed by mature B cells, and IGHA1 is part of IgA1, which is expressed by activated B cells. We can color the plot by both of these genes to visualize their expression.


We can use the lasso tool to select and classify these populations.



We can now visualize our classifications.


Optionally, you may wish to save this data viewer session if you need to go back and reclassify cells later. To save the session, click the  icon on the left and name the session.